Rubric

NR503_Week 5 Infectious Diseases Paper_Sept19
NR503_Week 5 Infectious Diseases Paper_Sept19
Criteria Ratings Pts
Assignment Content Possible Points =110 Points

Introduction of Infectious Disease

15.0 pts

Excellent
Comprehensive description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integrate at risk aggregate populations.

14.0 pts

V. Good
Adequately identifies the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integration of at-risk aggregate populations.

12.0 pts

Satisfactory
Limited description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integration of at-risk aggregate populations scantly present.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Unclear description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Integration of at-risk aggregate populations inaccurately discussed/not related.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Data is minimal or absent.
15.0 pts
Determinants of Health

40.0 pts

Excellent
Robust identification and description of the determinants of health with explanation of how those factors contribute to the development of this disease. Evidence supports background.

36.0 pts

V. Good
Identification of determinants is complete but lack depth in an area or overall, presents risk factors, disease impact and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics which are presented and supported by evidence.

33.0 pts

Satisfactory
Description of determinants is missing one or more key points. Limited presentation of the contributing factors. Lack of evidence to support writing may be present or evidence may be inconsistent throughout.

20.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Determinants missing depth in general and more than one key point and lack of contributing factors. There is may be no evidence or evidence may be present inconsistently or without relationship to writing.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Content is minimal if present or not included in writing at all.
40.0 pts
Epidemiological Triad

30.0 pts

Excellent
Comprehensive review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors). Writing includes examples that expand content beyond a definition into application. Full integration of evidence, sources.

27.0 pts

V. Good
Adequate review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors.) Examples may be omitted. There is integration of evidence in the majority of the writing.

25.0 pts

Satisfactory
Limited review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors.) Examples may be omitted. There is integration of evidence in the writing, which may be inconsistent.

15.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Minimal or unclear review of the epidemiological triad (the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors.) There are no examples. Evidence is present but may not be consistent throughout.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Review of the epidemiological triad (host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors) scant, unclear, or not provided.
30.0 pts
Role of the NP

25.0 pts

Excellent
Succinctly defines the role of the nurse practitioner according to a national nurse practitioner organization (Board of Nursing, AANP, for example) and synthesizes the role to the management of infectious diseases (surveillance, primary/secondary/tertiary interventions, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up). Writing includes integration of a model of practice which supports the implementation of an evidence-based practice. References support all writing.

23.0 pts

V. Good
An adequate, but not fully comprehensive review

21.0 pts

Satisfactory
A limited review

13.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Minimal or unclear

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Not provided
25.0 pts
Assignment Format Possible Points =15 Points

APA current edition

10.0 pts

Excellent
APA is accurate throughout the paper.

9.0 pts

V. Good
There are 1-3 APA errors.

8.0 pts

Satisfactory
There are 4-5 APA errors.

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement
There are 6-7 APA errors.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
There are greater than 7 APA errors.
10.0 pts
Spelling/grammar/ voice

5.0 pts

Excellent
No errors in spelling, grammar, and voice

4.0 pts

V. Good
There are 1-3 errors

3.0 pts

Satisfactory
There are 4-5 errors

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement
There are 6-7 errors

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
There are greater than 7 errors
5.0 pts
Late penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

0.0 pts

Minus Points

0.0 pts

Minus Points
0.0 pts
Total Points: 125.0