Rubric

NR503_Week 6 Chronic Health_Sept19
NR503_Week 6 Chronic Health_Sept19
Criteria Ratings Pts

Assignment Content Possible Points = 185 Points

Introduction of Healthcare Problem/Concern

15.0 pts

Excellent
Comprehensively and succinctly states the problem/concern. Clear presentation of the problem as well as the significance with a scholarly overview of the paper’s content.

14.0 pts

V. Good
Identifies the problem/concern with adequate but not in-depth presentation.

12.0 pts

Satisfactory
Identification of problem/concern is limited.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Improvement- Identification of problem/concern is unclear.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Improvement- Identification of problem/concern is unclear.
15.0 pts

Background/Significance

30.0 pts

Excellent
Background and significance is complete, presents risks, disease impact and includes a review of incidence and prevalence of the disease within the student’s state compared to national data. Evidence supports background. A student created table is included.

27.0 pts

V. Good
Background is complete, presents risk, disease impact and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics supported by evidence, for instance state data or national data is presented, but not both. Or, full data is presented but student table is not included.

26.0 pts

Satisfactory
Background missing one or more key points and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented. Lack of evidence or limited presentation of the background. A table is included which may or may not be student created; may be limited in data.

15.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Background missing more than one key point and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented, or there is no supported evidence. Unclear conclusions or presentation. No student created table is included; or if included is limited in scope or is not student created.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Background and significance of the disease is not provided.
30.0 pts

Surveillance and Reporting

30.0 pts

Excellent
Current state and national disease surveillance methods are reviewed along with currently gathered types of statistics and information on whether the disease is mandated for reporting. All writing is supported by evidence.

27.0 pts

V. Good
State and national disease surveillance methods are reviewed, currently gathered types of statistics is scant, reporting requirements discussed. All writing is supported by evidence.

26.0 pts

Satisfactory
State or national surveillance statistics are discussed as an overview, lacking detail / depth. Mandated reporting may be absent. Writing is supported by evidence but may be inconsistent.

15.0 pts

Needs Improvement
One of either state or national disease surveillance methods reviewed; currently gathered types of statistics may be missing or information on whether the disease is mandated for reporting is missing. There is a lack of depth with inconsistent use of evidence.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Content not discussed.
30.0 pts

Descriptive Epidemiology

35.0 pts

Excellent
Comprehensive review and analysis of descriptive epidemiological points for the chronic health problem. The 5 W’s of epidemiological analysis should be fully identified. Supported by scholarly evidence.

32.0 pts

V. Good
Review and analysis has depth in general but may be missing one of the 5 W’s OR may be scant in one area of the 5 W’s. All writing is supported by evidence.

29.0 pts

Satisfactory
Review and analysis superficial in all of the 5 W’s OR may be scant or missing 2 or more of the W’s. Evidence is present but may not be throughout all content areas.

18.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Review and analysis is missing depth throughout all of the content areas. Evidence may or may not support the writing.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No analysis provided.
35.0 pts

Screening, Diagnosis, Guidelines

30.0 pts

Excellent
Comprehensive review of current guidelines for screening and diagnosis. Screening tool statistics related to validity, predictive value, and reliability of screening tests are presented.

27.0 pts

V. Good
Adequate review of guidelines for screening, diagnosis, and statistics related to validity, predictive value, and reliability of screening tests is presented.

26.0 pts

Satisfactory
Limited review of guidelines for screening, diagnosis, and statistics related to validity, predictive value, and reliability of screening tests.

15.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Minimal or unclear review of guidelines for screening, diagnosis, and statistics related to validity, predictive value, and reliability of screening tests. There is a lack of depth with inconsistent use of evidence.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Review of guidelines for screening, diagnosis, and statistics related to validity, predictive value, and reliability of screening tests not provided.
30.0 pts

Plan

30.0 pts

Excellent
Integrating evidence, provide a plan of how a nurse practitioner will address this chronic health condition after graduation. Provide three specific interventions that are based on the evidence and include how you will measure outcomes (how will you know that the interventions have utility, are useful?) Note:  Consider primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions as well as the integration of health policy advocacy efforts. All interventions should be based on evidence – connected to a resource such as a scholarly piece of research.

27.0 pts

V. Good
An adequate, but not fully comprehensive, plan of action specific to the problem, and the geographic area is presented with 3 evidenced based actions that will be taken to address the impact, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease.

26.0 pts

Satisfactory
A limited plan of action specific to the problem, and the geographic area, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease. Three actions or less may be presented with limited or little evidence.

15.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Minimal or unclear review of guidelines for screening, diagnosis, and statistics related to validity, predictive value, and reliability of screening tests. Actions are minimal or unclear, or lack specificity, are not supported directly by evidence or are not direct actions the student can take in practice. There is a lack of depth with inconsistent use of evidence.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Plan of action not provided.
30.0 pts

Summary/Conclusion = 185 Points

15.0 pts

Excellent
The conclusion thoroughly, clearly, succinctly, and logically presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action. Includes scholarly references.

14.0 pts

V. Good
The conclusion adequately and logically presents major points of the paper with clear direction for action, but lacks one major point or is not succinct. Includes scholarly references.

12.0 pts

Satisfactory
The conclusion is a limited review of key points of the paper, is not succinct, or lacks one or more major points of the paper or clear direction for action. Scholarly references may or may not be included.

8.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Conclusion is unclear or significantly limited in overview of the paper. Scholarly references may or may not be included.

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
No Summary/conclusion is included.
15.0 pts

Assignment Format Possible Points =15 Points

APA 6th ed.

10.0 pts

Excellent
APA is consistently utilized according to the 6th edition throughout the paper.

9.0 pts

V. Good
One or two errors in APA format

8.0 pts

Satisfactory
Three-Five errors in APA format

5.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Six errors in APA format

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Greater than six errors in APA formatting.
10.0 pts

Grammar, Syntax, Spelling

5.0 pts

Excellent
There are no grammar, unscholarly context or “voice” errors in the paper and spelling is accurate throughout.

4.0 pts

V. Good
One or two errors

3.0 pts

Satisfactory
Three-five errors

2.0 pts

Needs Improvement
Six errors

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory
Greater than six errors
5.0 pts

Late penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

0.0 pts

Minus Points

0.0 pts

Minus Points
0.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0