The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) identify and articulate key concepts of the future shared-governance model you wish to initiate at Saint Louis Medical Center (SLMC) (CO 5), (b) provide empirical, scholarly evidence to support your proposed project (CO 4), and (c) communicate your information in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO 5).
Note: You are completing this assignment as if you are the nurse executive for SLMC. You are to decide what elements of the shared-governance model you would like to adopt and implement for your organization. You may search on the internet for examples of a Magnet Report. Please also refer to the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) Magnet website.
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Total Points Possible: 200
Note: Use the documents under Course Resources related to SLMC to assist in the completion of this assignment, as needed.
Note: as the nurse executive for SLMC, you decide what elements of a shared-governance model you would like to adopt/implement for your organization.
Category | Points | % | Description |
Introduction | 30 | 15% | Introduction clearly introduces your shared- governance model project and purpose of the assignment. |
Shared Governance Model Concepts | 45 | 22.5% | The key concepts of the shared-governance model for the project are clearly articulated. |
Evidence | 30 | 15% | There is a minimum of three scholarly, empirical evidence sources supporting your project. |
Examples | 40 | 20% | Examples clearly demonstrate the impact or importance of your shared-governance model related to nursing. |
Conclusion | 30 | 15% | Concluding statements summarizing content are present. |
Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. | 10 | 5% | Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. |
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. | 10 | 5% | Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. |
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. | 5 | 2.5% | Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. |
Total | 200 | 100 | A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance |
Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement
(38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
|
Content
Possible Points = 175 Points |
||||||
Introduction | 30 points | 26 points | 24 points | 11 Points | 0 points | |
Introduction introduces your shared-governance model and purpose of assignment clearly. | Introduction introduces your shared-governance model with minor lack of clarity or elements. | Introduction of shared-governance model lacks occasional important element or specificity. | Introduction of shared-governance model has multiple instances of inaccuracies | Introduction of shared-governance model is not present. | ||
Shared-Governance Model Concepts | 45 points | 40 points | 36 points | 17 Points | 0 points | |
Identification of key concepts of shared-governance concepts is articulated clearly with no inaccuracy. | Identification of key concepts of shared-governance concepts is articulated with rare inaccuracy. | Identification of key concepts of shared-governance concepts lacks occasional important elements or specificity. | Identification of key concepts of shared-governance concepts has multiple instances of inaccuracies. | Identification of key concepts of shared-governance is not present. | ||
Evidence | 30 points | 26 points | 24 points | 11 Points | 0 points | |
At least three empirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your project are included. | Empirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your project included with rare inaccuracy; or only two sources are included. | Empirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your project lack occasional important element or specificity; or less than two sources are included. | Empirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your project have multiple instances of inaccuracies. | Empirical, scholarly evidence sources supporting your project are not present. | ||
Examples | 40 points | 35 points | 32 points | 15 points | 0 points | |
Specific examples clearly demonstrate the impact or importance of your shared-governance model related to nursing. | Examples demonstrate the impact or importance of your shared-governance model related to nursing, with missing elements. | Examples demonstrate moderate impact or importance of your shared-governance model related to nursing. | Examples demonstrate limited impact or importance of your shared-governance model related to nursing. | Examples are not present. | ||
Conclusion | 30 points | 26 points | 24 points | 11 Points | 0 points | |
Concluding statements summarizing content are present and accurate. | Concluding statements summarizing content are present with rare inaccuracy or missing elements. | Concluding statements summarizing content lack occasional important elements or specificity. | Concluding statements summarizing content have multiple instances of inaccuracies. | Concluding statements are absent. | ||
Content Subtotal | _____ of 175 points | |||||
Format
Possible Points = 20 points |
||||||
Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. | 10 points | 9 points | 8 points | 4 points | 0 points | |
Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format. | Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format, with two to four exceptions. | There are five to seven APA format errors in the text, title page, and reference pages. | There are eight to nine APA format errors in the text, title page, and reference pages | There are more than 10 APA format errors in the text, title page, and reference pages. | ||
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. | 10 points | 9 points | 8 points | 4 points | 0 points | |
Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. | Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly, with two to four exceptions. | Ideas and information from other sources are cited with five to seven errors. | Ideas and information from other sources are cited with eight to nine errors. | Ideas and information from other sources are cited with more than 10 errors. | ||
Grammar
Possible Points = 5 points |
||||||
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. | 5 points | 4 points | 3 points | 2 Points | 0 points | |
Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. | Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed, with two to four exceptions. | Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work, with five to seven exceptions. | Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work, with eight to nine exceptions. | Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed with more than 10 exceptions. | ||
Format Subtotal | _____ of 25 points | |||||
Total Points | _____ of 200 points | |||||
Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.